Regents of the University of California v. Bakke :: American America History

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke established in 1968, the medical school at the University of California implemented a particular(a) admissions programme to increase the representation of minorities in each entering curriculum. at that place was one underlying problem with their special admissions program that was not addressed until 1973 when Allan Bakke submitted his application to the University of California. Their special admissions program worked by reserving sixteen percent of the entering class for minorities. The minorities entering through this special admissions program were processed and consultationed separately from the regular applicants. The bulls eye pull down averages and standardized test scores from the special-admissions entrants were significantly lower than the grade point averages and standardized test scores of the regular entrants, including our dear friend Allan Bakke. In 1973 Allan Bakke utilise to the medical school at the Universi ty of California. His application was rejected because it was saturnine in near the end of the year and by the time his application was up for favor they were only accepting those who had scored 470 or better on their interview scores. Bakke had only scored a 468 out of the possible 500. When he learned that four of the special-admissions spots were left unfilled at the time his application was rejected he wrote a letter to Dr. George H. Lowrey, the associate dean and chairman of the admissions committee, stating how the special admissions system was unjust and prejudiced. When Bakke use again in 1974 he was once again rejected. This time Bakke sued the University of California. His position was that the school had excluded him on the basis of his slipstream and violated his rights under the Equal protective covering Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the California Constitution, and civil rights legislation. The trial hail ruled in Bakkes favor, however they did not order th e University of California to recognize him. Bakke appealed to the California autocratic Court where they ruled that the schools admissions programs were unconstitutional and ordered the school to admit Bakke as a student. The school appealed this last and brought it to the Supreme Court to argue their case on October 12th 1977. The Supreme Court upheld the California Supreme Courts decision with a 5-4 vote. The Court also ruled that the special-admissions program constituted reverse discrimination and was so illegal. The Court also said that schools could continue to look at race as a factor when accepting applicants, but they could not set up a quota system or look at race as the only deciding factor.Regents of the University of California v. Bakke American America HistoryRegents of the University of California v. BakkeEstablished in 1968, the medical school at the University of California implemented a special admissions program to increase the representation of minorities in each entering class. There was one underlying problem with their special admissions program that was not addressed until 1973 when Allan Bakke submitted his application to the University of California. Their special admissions program worked by reserving sixteen percent of the entering class for minorities. The minorities entering through this special admissions program were processed and interviewed separately from the regular applicants. The grade point averages and standardized test scores from the special-admissions entrants were significantly lower than the grade point averages and standardized test scores of the regular entrants, including our dear friend Allan Bakke. In 1973 Allan Bakke applied to the medical school at the University of California. His application was rejected because it was turned in near the end of the year and by the time his application was up for consideration they were only accepting those who had scored 470 or better on their interview scores. Bakk e had only scored a 468 out of the possible 500. When he learned that four of the special-admissions spots were left unfilled at the time his application was rejected he wrote a letter to Dr. George H. Lowrey, the associate dean and chairman of the admissions committee, stating how the special admissions system was unjust and prejudiced. When Bakke applied again in 1974 he was once again rejected. This time Bakke sued the University of California. His position was that the school had excluded him on the basis of his race and violated his rights under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the California Constitution, and civil rights legislation. The trial court ruled in Bakkes favor, however they did not order the University of California to admit him. Bakke appealed to the California Supreme Court where they ruled that the schools admissions programs were unconstitutional and ordered the school to admit Bakke as a student. The school appealed this decision and br ought it to the Supreme Court to argue their case on October 12th 1977. The Supreme Court upheld the California Supreme Courts decision with a 5-4 vote. The Court also ruled that the special-admissions program constituted reverse discrimination and was therefore illegal. The Court also said that schools could continue to look at race as a factor when accepting applicants, but they could not set up a quota system or look at race as the only deciding factor.